A graph database, a type of NoSQL database, owes its origins to graph theory, where interconnected objects are represented using vertices/nodes and edges.
Graph databases consider relationships between data entities as first-class citizens. As such, a graph database does more than store and show what data you have; it explicitly links the entities in your data to let you see at a glance how those entities are related.
In contrast to relational databases, where data is stored in rigid tables, rows, and columns, data in a graph database is stored as a network of entities (nodes) and relationships (edges).
This post explores the different types of graph databases, how they work using real-world examples, and how to solve challenges associated with them.
Among the numerous open-source graph databases available are three top options we will focus on here: Neo4j, ArangoDB, and OrientDB.
Neo4j is a versatile database with the ability to traverse billions of relationships in seconds. It supports the declarative and human-readable Cypher query language, allowing users to run complex queries more easily and traverse graphs faster to uncover hidden entity relationships.
Neo4j is also ACID-compliant, ensuring data relationships revealed are accurate and consistent.
This multi-model database boasts some 14,000 GitHub stars. While it features support for key-value, document, and graph dta models, all models can be queried using a single unified query language, the ArangoDB Query Language (AQL).
Given its flexibility, ArangoDB performs superbly in complex applications that demand multiple data representations and querying formats. It also supports ACID transactions and low-latency querying.
Also a multi-model database, OrientDB is known for being high-performance and having rich community support. It offers a distributed graph database featuring SQL and ACID support, fast and flexible querying, and large-scale data storage.
OrientDB users don’t require resource-intensive runtime JOINs, due to the database’s graph relationship and document link capabilities, enabling cost savings.
Let’s take a quick look at the graph database offerings from some major cloud providers, specifically Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure.
AWS Neptune supports multiple graph models, such as property graph and RDF. It also integrates with other AWS services, which makes it a strong choice for knowledge graphs, as well as fraud detection and social networking.
Azure Cosmos DB provides graph capabilities using the Gremlin API. It also supports various other NoSQL databases and is known for its high availability, millisecond latency, and global distribution. These attributes make it an ideal choice for any application that needs multi-model support, fast querying, and seamless scalability.
Some unique features and benefits cloud-based graph databases have to offer include:
The fastest route to set up and work with cloud-based graph databases entails three steps:
Note: Visit AWS or Azure for more detailed tutorials.
GraphDB is a powerful and versatile graph database with open-source and enterprise-grade versions. It supports RDF and SPARQL standards, and offers a range of features, including large-scale semantic inferencing, real-time data synchronization with Kafka, and rich integration with high-performance search engines like Lucene and OpenSearch.
GraphDB is available as a cloud deployment via the AWS or Azure marketplace. Its popularity stems from its compatibility with industry standards and strong support at both the community and commercial levels.
Let’s explore some GraphDB offerings and their applications:
The two primary graph database models are the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and property graphs.
An RDF graph represents data using triple stores: subject-predicate-object. However, as it wasn’t exactly designed for querying knowledge graphs, RDF falls short where data has a complicated many-to-many rather than a direct subject-to-object relationship. Graph databases based only on RDF are mostly queried using SPARQL.
Designed specifically for graph databases, the property graph optimizes data storage, query execution, and query speeds. It consists of three elements:
Unlike RDF graphs, property graphs support myriad languages, including Graph SQL and Graph Query Language (GQL).
Note: GQL isn’t to be confused with GraphQL, an API query language unrelated to graph databases.
Although Graph SQL and GQL are both powerful, they are distinctly different:
GraphSQL and GraphQL are also distinct technologies serving different purposes:
Both address data efficiency but in separate domains: APls vs. graph databases.
Data stored in a graph database can be visually represented in a chart or diagram. This visualization can be enhanced by varying the colors and fonts of nodes and edges to make traversing the graph easier.
Visualizing graph data can help users:
Given their ability to model interconnected data, graph databases are uniquely suited to use cases where unearthing implicit relationships is critical and would be otherwise impossible—or financially impractical.
Social media platforms leverage graph databases to represent friends, followers, and connections. Companies such as LinkedIn and Facebook also use them for targeted ads and “People You May Know” suggestions.
Financial, investigative, and e-commerce institutions deploy graph databases to examine the links between individual account holders and various transactions. This enables them to uncover fraudulent activities. ICIJ used Neo4j’s graph database to find the millions of hidden connections in the landmark Panama Papers investigation, recognized as the world's largest financial leak story.
E-commerce websites use graph databases to map information collected about you, such as your purchase patterns, occupation, and age. This allows them to then offer personalized recommendations when you open their webpages or apps.
Graph databases come with both benefits and specific concerns.
There are a few key reasons to use graph databases, especially when compared with relational databases:
The disadvantages of implementing these databases boil down to three things:
The graph database landscape is changing, with new trends emerging to solve existing challenges. From all indications, graph databases are becoming a bigger part of next-generation data solutions. For example, they increasingly support machine learning algorithms, particularly in areas like predictive analytics, where relationship data enhances model accuracy.
ISO’s attempt at standardizing GQL is another interesting innovation, as well as efforts to improve the horizontal scalability and performance of graph databases; this latter would make it feasible to manage increasingly large, distributed, and complex datasets.
Advances in streaming and real-time graph processing are equally evolving, allowing organizations to derive insights from live, dynamic data for applications such as fraud detection, GenAI use cases, recommendation engines, and personalized content delivery.
Graph databases are ideal for modeling and querying complex relationships, making them a valuable asset in sectors like finance, AI, e-commerce, and social media. From powering fraud detection to driving personalized recommendations, they reveal connections that traditional databases often miss.
Site24x7’s database monitoring, you get end-to-end visibility into performance, query execution, resource usage, and more, whether your graph database is self-hosted or cloud-based.
As graph databases evolve with better scalability and machine learning integration, having the right monitoring in place will be key to maximizing their potential.